Things that differ

Nearly every Christian has been taught, and hence nearly every Christian believes, that there is only one Gospel, as well as that Paul taught exactly the same things Jesus and His disciples taught while He walked the earth. In fact, this is such a commonly accepted presupposition among Christians that many are surprised when they learn about those of us in the body of Christ who believe otherwise (we believe there is a Gospel preached by Paul called the Gospel of the Uncircumcision, as well as a Gospel preached by Peter and Jesus’ other disciples called the Gospel of the Circumcision, also known as the Gospel of the kingdom). Of course, many atheists, and even a small number of Christians, are able to see the differences between these Gospels and doctrines (in fact, many atheists like to point out the differences in order to try to prove that the Bible contradicts itself), but because very few Christians ever question what they’ve been taught by their religious leaders, it’s rare for one of them to realize that there might be more than one legitimate Gospel (and even more than one kind of salvation) written about in Scripture, and that Paul might actually have been teaching doctrines which are very different from what they’ve grown up following. For this reason, many of the religious leaders within the Christian religion do their best to make sure their followers don’t ever come to recognize the many differences between Paul’s teachings and the rest of the Bible, because it would take away too much of the control they have over their “flock“ if the members of their congregations ever came to realize the truth about what Paul taught.

While heralding the good news of the impending arrival of the New Covenant, Jesus had an earthly ministry that was still pretty much entirely under the Old Covenant, and was only a minister of the circumcision “to confirm the promises made unto the fathers” while He walked the earth, meaning He was sent only unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And it’s important to note that this assertion was made by Jesus in regards to His disciples’ request to help a Gentile, so people who believe it doesn’t mean what it sounds like it means have to explain how it can instead mean His earthly ministry was directed to everyone instead of specifically to Jews, when the entire context of the verse is Jesus at first refusing to help a Gentile woman (yes, He did eventually relent and help her, as well as a couple other Gentiles on other occasions, but the Bible makes it clear how unusual this was, just as it does on the one occasion Peter spoke with Gentiles in the book of Acts, which only goes to support this doctrine further). Despite making a couple exceptions for very specific reasons, His earthly ministry (aside from His death for our sins, His burial, and His resurrection, of course) was not directed towards the Gentiles, and His teachings were about the kingdom of heaven coming to earth — specifically to Israel — rather than the body of Christ going to the heavens (as the later teachings of the glorified Christ — meaning Jesus after His resurrection and ascension into heaven — through the apostle Paul were). In fact, He made it very clear to His disciples when He sent them to preach the Gospel of the kingdom during His earthly ministry that they should not go to the Gentiles or even to the Samaritans, which seems strange if this Gospel was meant for everyone (especially if this particular Gospel had anything to do with escaping never-ending torment in hell, as most people mistakenly assume it does; you’d think it would be urgent to get the message out to as many people in the area as possible if that was the message).

The fact that there are at least two Gospels in Scripture is actually pretty obvious to anyone who is paying attention since, if the Gospel Paul taught included Christ’s death for our sins, and the “Gospel of the kingdom” that Jesus’ disciples taught while He still walked the earth didn’t — which it couldn’t have, because His disciples didn’t even understand that He was going to die at that point — these two Gospel messages can’t legitimately be said to be the same Gospel message because they just don’t contain the same message. You see, the word “Gospel” literally means “Good News,” or ”news which is good,” and the word “news” quite literally refers to “a series of specific words which, when laid out in a specific order, conveys specific information about a specific subject.” This means that if you have another set of specific words which, when laid out in their own specific order, convey some other sort of specific information about that subject, you can’t say that you have the same news, even if both sets of news are good in nature, or even about the same person (for example, the news that “Joshua went to the graveyard” can’t be said to be the exact same news as “Joshua is now my boss” because the two messages mean something entirely different from one another since they convey entirely different pieces of information about this person from one another: one piece of news being about an action this person took, with the other piece of news being about the identity of said person). Because they’re providing us with different sorts of information about a subject from one another, it means they are, by definition, different sets of news. And so, considering the fact that the news which was good that Jesus’ disciples preached to Israel during His time on earth didn’t include Christ’s death for our sins the way the news which is good that Paul later preached to the nations did, anyone who believes that these two different sets of news which are good (one set of news containing information about Christ’s death for our sins and the other set of news not containing that information at all) are the exact same news as one another, and hence that there is only one set of news which is good recorded in the Bible, is seriously lying to themselves based on that simple fact alone.

Of course, anyone who believes that Paul was later preaching the exact same Gospel to the Uncircumcision that Peter was preaching (I say later because, in the messages Paul is recorded as having preached in the book of Acts, many of them were still connected with the Gospel of the Circumcision) also has to explain how Paul could possibly have never heard this Gospel the entire time he was persecuting Jewish believers. And yet, based on what he told the Galatians, he didn’t hear the Gospel he preached to the Gentiles from any mortal humans, but rather learned it directly from the glorified Christ. It’s extremely difficult to believe that he somehow wasn’t aware of the most important teaching of those he was persecuting — one would be hard-pressed to answer the question of why he was persecuting them in the first place if he didn’t know what they believed — and it doesn’t appear that he was told it by Jesus on the road to Damascus either, yet he immediately preached the Gospel that Peter and the rest of the apostles were preaching after being healed by Ananias, so the obvious conclusion is that the good news he later preached to the Gentiles wasn’t the same good news which Peter preached to Israel and the proselytes, and which Paul himself preached at the beginning of his ministry in Damascus, as well as in Jerusalem three years later, where the disciples became acquainted with him for a couple weeks, and would have also gotten to know the Gospel he was preaching while there. If it was the same Gospel he’d already preached with them in Jerusalem, he wouldn’t have had to return a decade or so later to explain what the Gospel he was later preaching among the Gentiles was, since they would have already been familiar with it from his previous visit, which explains why he said his Gospel was instead given to him by revelation, perhaps while in Arabia, since this had to have been taught to him after he’d already preached Peter’s Gospel in Damascus.

Now, aside from ignoring the logic of what I just wrote, in order to argue that there’s only one Gospel in Scripture (and that the result of salvation is the same for everyone), it also helps to first assume that the Israel of God and the church known as the body of Christ are actually one and the same entity, and that references to Israel in Scripture are actually references to said church, and so this has become a very common teaching within the Christian religion (even most Dispensationalists, despite claiming to believe they’re not the same group, end up mixing and matching the two groups in their doctrines). However, if someone is able to let go of the presupposition that there can be only one Gospel when studying Scripture, and compare the teachings of Paul to the rest of the Bible without holding onto that assumption, it quickly becomes apparent that the body of Christ is not the same group of people as those known as the Israel of God. In fact, this is made quite obvious by reading the very passage in which the Israel of God is named (Galatians 6:16, which says, “And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God”), where peace and mercy is wished on “as many as walk according to this rule” — referring to those in the body of Christ who follow the teaching Paul had just given — “and upon the Israel of God” as well. That these can’t be the same people is made obvious by the words “and upon,” since “and upon” tells us there are two separate groups of people being wished peace by Paul there. There’s no way to legitimately read that passage in any way that implies Paul was actually saying, ”And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and, oh yeah, these people are also called the Israel of God.” That translation doesn’t even make any sense, which means there have to be two separate groups being written about there (the first group being “as many as walk according to this rule,” referring to members of the body of Christ, and the second group being those known as “the Israel of God”).

Likewise, we can also see that Israel is a distinct group from the Gentiles in the body of Christ when Paul refers to Israel as the natural olive branches in Romans 11. Remember, not all of the natural olive branches are pruned out of the tree (which itself is not a reference to Israel, by the way, since Israel is only the natural branches of the tree, not the whole tree itself) in that figurative explanation of present and future events, but rather some remained attached to the tree while the wild olive branch (referring to those of the nations) was grafted into the tree next to believing Israel/the Israel of God rather than replacing them, and we also know that the pruned-off natural branches will be grafted back into the tree eventually as well (this will occur at the time the wild branch is removed from the tree — if this seems confusing, it helps to understand that this passage has nothing to do with the salvation of individuals or the idea of losing salvation, which is made clear by the fact that the pruned-off natural branches were never saved to begin with and yet had to have been a part of the tree at one time in order to be pruned from it, and so if being a part of the tree means being saved, they never could have been a part of the tree in the first place). As Paul makes clear, Israel is not cast away permanently, but is only cast away temporarily, until the full complement of the nations may be entering, at which point Israel will become the focus of God’s purposes again (since His promises and gifts are without repentance, which means it goes without saying that Israel will indeed be brought to faith and be saved in the end).

So, no, the body of Christ has not been subsumed into Israel, or even replaced Israel, and is not now “spiritual Israel” as some like to claim. Aside from the scriptural proofs I’ve already given above, that this isn’t the case is made obvious right from the beginning of the table of comparisons below, where we can see that Israel will still follow the law when the New Covenant comes fully into effect, whereas Paul went to great pains in his writings to explain that those of us in the body of Christ are not under the law, nor should we be trying to follow the law, and, in fact, we are not to allow ourselves to be placed under it in any way whatsoever (which includes any religious rules at all, I should add).

The fact of the matter is, nowhere in Scripture is the body of Christ referred to as Israel, so to conflate the two of them requires one to read a preexisting bias towards the idea that they are one and the same into the various passages referring to Israel (not to mention the passages referring to Judah, which raises other questions such as, if the references to Israel in prophecy are actually a reference to the body of Christ, who or what is “Judah” — which is listed as a different group from Israel — in these prophecies a reference to?), but there’s no scriptural basis for doing so that I’ve ever seen (and believe me, I’ve looked, studying the Amillennialist perspective on this in order to see if they might have any plausible or convincing arguments for their position, but thus far, all of the attempts I’ve seen to reinterpret the Israel passages as referring to the body of Christ have been found severely wanting, which is almost certainly because those who have tried to do so in the past — at least all the Amillennialist theologians I’ve read — don’t seem to have been familiar with the consistent interpretations those of us in the body of Christ understand, which perfectly resolve the scriptural difficulties Amillennialists have with Dispensationalist Premillennialism). This means the default position has to remain that Israel is still Israel (even if not all ethnic Israelites are currently members of the Israel of God; and it should be noted that Paul was reducing the scope of the Israel of God there, not expanding it, since, although there might be the odd Gentile proselyte such as Cornelius and his family joining it — presuming his family wasn’t simply an example of how members of the nations will be saved by Israelites during the Millennium — members of the Israel of God will still primarily be Israelites), and the body of Christ is an entirely separate entity from Israel altogether (which, just as an aside, is also the position that was held to by pretty much by all Christians for the first few centuries of Christendom, until Augustine went and changed that fact; and while those of us in the body of Christ today don’t necessarily base our theology on what Christians have historically considered to fall under the purview of “orthodoxy” or “orthopraxy,” this is still a fact that those who are considering the topic should be aware of).

So, with all that in mind, let’s compare some of the teachings given to and about the Israel of God in the Circumcision writings (meaning the books of the Bible not signed by Paul) to the teachings given to and about the body of Christ by Paul, which should reveal a clear pattern of differences between the two sets of teachings, demonstrating not only the significant difference between the two churches, but also that the requirements for (or method of) salvation for both is somewhat different for each, and that what their respective salvations consist of is different as well.

The Israel of God/The Gospel of the CircumcisionThe body of Christ/The Gospel of the Uncircumcision
Will keep the law perfectly when the New Covenant finally comes fully into effect and replaces the Old Covenant completely (Jeremiah 31:31-34, Ezekiel 36:26–27, Micah 4:2, Hebrews 8:8-12)Not only are we not under the law at all, and in fact should not try to keep any of it (Romans 6:14, Galatians 5:3), Gentiles were never under the Old Covenant — which was about Israelites keeping the Mosaic law — to begin with, so we don’t have an Old Covenant to be replaced with by a New Covenant the way Israel does anyway (Exodus 12:43-49, Exodus 19:3-6, Leviticus 26:46, Deuteronomy 28, Nehemiah 9:13-14, Psalm 147:19-20, Romans 2:14-15, Romans 9:3-5, Ephesians 2:12)
Jewish believers within this church were still zealous of the law, even after the Council of Jerusalem, and they were upset that Paul was teaching Jewish members of the body of Christ to avoid practicing the Mosaic law, including circumcising (Acts 21:17-26)Not only did Paul teach against circumcising — or any law-keeping — for Gentiles in the body of Christ, he taught against it for anyone in the body of Christ, including Jewish members, and if Paul was teaching the same thing that Peter and James and the rest of the Jewish church were, the members of their church in Jerusalem wouldn’t have been so upset at Paul for teaching against circumcising and law-keeping for Jewish members of his church when he visited them later (Acts 15:1-21, Galatians 2:1-3, Acts 21:17-26)
Spoken of by the prophets since the world began (Acts 3:21-25)A secret until Paul (Romans 16:25, Ephesians 3:8-10)
Only 12 apostles for this church — a number with much spiritual significance to Israelites — and they were all called inside of Israel (Matthew 4:18-22, Matthew 10:2-4). Even though Judas was replaced by Matthias after being disqualified (Acts 1:12-26), no others out of the 12 were ever replaced because there will only be 12 thrones for them to sit on during the Millennium, and only 12 foundations of the wall of the New Jerusalem to be named after them on the New Earth (Matthew 19:28, Revelation 21:14)The first apostle of our church — who is not one of the 12 apostles of the Israel of God — was called outside of Israel (Acts 9:3). This is spiritually significant because Paul was the apostle to the Gentiles (Romans 11:13)
Are supposed to eventually disciple all the nations, to baptize them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and to teach them to obey everything Jesus commanded (Matthew 28:16-20), although — outside of Peter’s visit to Cornelius — Scripture tells us this hasn’t happened yet (Acts 11:19, Galatians 2:8-9)The fact that Paul is called the apostle to the Gentiles, and that a whole new set of apostles were in fact sent to the Gentiles, is significant because it means the 12 apostles of the Israel of God were not the apostles to the Gentiles (Romans 11:13, Acts 14:14, 1 Corinthians 4:6-9, Ephesians 4:11), nor were the rest of the members of that church preaching to the Gentiles yet either, since the pillars of their church had agreed to leave the preaching to the Gentiles to Paul and to those with him, for the time being, which means Israel hasn’t even really begun her so-called “Great Commission,” as it’s often referred to, yet (Galatians 2:8-9, Acts 13:2)
Proclaimed among Israelites (James 1:1, 1 Peter 1:1)Proclaimed among the Gentiles (Ephesians 3:8)
As future citizens of the New Jerusalem, which is referred to as the bride of the lamb itself after it descends to the New Earth, the saints of this church who will inhabit this city can figuratively (albeit only proleptically) be referred to as the bride of the lamb (John 3:29, Revelation 21:9)The saints of this church are referred to as the body of Christ (Ephesians 5:30)
Racial distinctions important (Matthew 15:26, Matthew 19:28, Revelation 21:12, Zechariah 8:23)Racial distinctions irrelevant (1 Corinthians 12:13, Galatians 3:28)
Believers known from the foundation of the world (Revelation 17:8)Believers known before the foundation of the world (Ephesians 1:4)
Believers called first, then chosen (Matthew 22:14)Believers chosen first, then called (Romans 8:30)
Water baptism required (Acts 2:38)Water baptism not required (1 Corinthians 1:17, 1 Corinthians 12:13)
Many types of baptism/immersion: John’s baptism in water unto repentance, the Lord’s baptism in water — obviously not a baptism unto repentance — water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ/the name of the Lord, baptism in the Holy Spirit, and in fire, baptism into Moses, and baptism in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 3:11, 13-17, Acts 1:4-5, Acts 2:38, Acts 10:48, 1 Corinthians 10:2, Matthew 28:19)Only one baptism/immersion: not in the Holy Spirit (or in water either), but rather by the Holy Spirit, into the body of Christ, including into what He experienced in His body, such as His death (Ephesians 4:5, 1 Corinthians 12:13, Romans 6:3-4)
Must be born again (John 3:3)Are an entirely new creation (2 Corinthians 5:17)
Must have circumcision of the heart (Deuteronomy 10:16, Acts 7:51, Romans 2:29)Circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ (Colossians 2:11)
Must have works, since faith without works is dead for them (James 2:20)Even if we don’t have works, but only have faith, we are still justified, which means faith without works is not dead for us (Romans 4:5)
Must keep His commandments, and live as Jesus did (1 John 2:3-6)God’s grace motivates us to live well, not the threat of losing our salvation if we don’t, as is the case for Israel (2 Corinthians 5:14-15)
Must forgive others or God will not forgive them (Matthew 6:15)Should forgive one another as God has already forgiven us (Ephesians 4:32) — but even without works, we’re still justified, so we aren’t required to forgive others in order to be saved, even if it’s still good for us to do so (Romans 4:5)
Must not eat things sacrificed to idols (Revelation 2:14, 20)Are permitted to eat things sacrificed to idols as long as conscience permits it (Romans 14:14, 1 Corinthians 8:4)
Must be an overcomer to avoid second death (Revelation 2:11)Saved from second death by grace alone (Ephesians 2:8-9)
Hoping for grace, which will be brought to them when Jesus returns to the earth (1 Peter 1:13)Already standing in grace (Romans 5:2)
Must be waking and watching, not sleeping (Matthew 25:1-13, Luke 12:37, Hebrews 9:28)Whether waking or sleeping (1 Thessalonians 5:10)
Must be wise, not foolish, or will not be chosen (Matthew 25:1-13)Few who are wise are chosen, and most who are chosen are foolish (1 Corinthians 1:26-29)
Can be put to shame at His presence if not careful (1 John 2:28)Will all be changed for the better — meaning given glorified, immortal bodies — at His presence, which is the blessed hope all of us in this church should be looking forward to (1 Thessalonians 4:15-17, 1 Corinthians 15:52, Titus 2:13)
Will go through day of wrath (Revelation 6:1-17)Not appointed to wrath (1 Thessalonians 1:10, 1 Thessalonians 5:9)
Will meet Christ on earth (Acts 1:11-12, Zechariah 14:4)Will meet Christ in the air (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17)
The resurrection of the just, also known as Israel’s “first resurrection” (Luke 14:14, Revelation 20:1-6), occurs after Christ’s second coming to the earth, 75 days after His feet touch down on the Mount of Olives (Zechariah 14:4-7, Acts 1:9-12, and compare the numbers in Daniel 12:11-13 to the numbers in Revelation 13:5 to understand the 75 day difference)The dead in the body of Christ are first resurrected, then those who are still living will rise with them to meet Christ in the air together when He comes for our church, before He ever even gets close to the Mount of Olives (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17)
Will reign on the earth as a kingdom of priests over the nations (Exodus 19:6, 1 Peter 2:5-9, Revelation 2:26-27, Revelation 5:10, Revelation 20:6, Isaiah 61:6)Will reign in the heavens (Ephesians 2:6-7, 2 Timothy 2:12)
Will fill earth with knowledge of God’s glory by being a light to the Gentiles and salvation to the ends of the earth (Habakkuk 2:14, Isaiah 49:6)Will display God’s wisdom among the principalities and powers in the heavens (Ephesians 3:10-11)
The meek shall inherit the earth, and will live in the land God gave the patriarchs, which is the land of Israel (Matthew 5:5, Ezekiel 36:28)Our citizenship is in the heavens (Philippians 3:20)
There will still be mortal “flesh and blood” humans living in the part of the Kingdom of God that is on the earth, and they will even continue to reproduce, during the Millennium, and even on the New Earth for a time (Zechariah 8:3-4, Isaiah 65:17-25, Ephesians 3:21)Mortal “flesh and blood” is not able to inherit in the part of the Kingdom of God that is in the heavens. This is simply because we’d suffocate from lack of oxygen, or freeze to death, or die from radiation poisoning out there in the heavens without an immortal body (1 Corinthians 15:50-54)
The 12 apostles will judge the 12 tribes of Israel (Matthew 19:28)Paul, not one of the 12 apostles of the church known as the Israel of God, but rather the first apostle of the church known as the body of Christ, will, along with the rest of the body, judge the whole world — presumably at the Great White Throne Judgement; based on how long it would take one Person to judge everyone on His own, Jesus will need a whole group of people to dispense this judgement, since it takes place on earth among the resurrected dead, not outside of time — as well as judge angels (1 Corinthians 6:2-3)
Their Gospel is also called the Gospel of the Kingdom, and it was the Good News that the Kingdom of God was near, meaning ready to begin if Israel met the required conditions (Mark 1:14-15), which they did not, so its fully coming into effect on earth — specifically in Israel — has been pushed back while the Gentiles are temporarily saved apart from Israel (Acts 28:17-28, Romans 11)Our Gospel was also called “my Gospel” by Paul, which is why we now call it Paul’s Gospel, and it’s simply the Good News that Christ died for our sins, that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day (Romans 2:16, Romans 16:25, 2 Timothy 2:8, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4)
Had to believe that Jesus is Israel’s awaited Messiah and the Son of God, as well as follow this belief up with good works such as water baptism, forgiving others, and all the rest of Jesus’ earthly commands, and even have to endure to the end — of their life or of the Tribulation, whichever comes first — in order to be saved under this Gospel, although this is only salvation from a relative perspective (John 20:31, Acts 2:38, Acts 8:36-38, Matthew 3:8, Matthew 6:15, Matthew 24:13). The 12 did not understand that Jesus was going to die, so they couldn’t have been preaching anything related to Paul’s Gospel about Christ’s death for our sins when Jesus sent them to preach the Gospel of the Kingdom while He walked the earth (Luke 18:31-34, Matthew 10:5-7, 22)Said to be saved when we believe the Good News — which includes understanding what it means — that Christ died for our sins, that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day (1 Corinthians 15:1-4), although this is only salvation from a relative perspective, since all humanity is guaranteed salvation from an absolute perspective because of what Paul’s Gospel means, even if those who believe this Gospel now get a special, early experience of salvation before everyone else (1 Corinthians 15:22-28, 1 Timothy 4:10)
The cross was only bad news to those hearing the Gospel of the Kingdom — at least in the sermons recorded in Acts— and a shameful thing which needed to be repented of in order to be saved (Acts 2:22-38, Acts 3:13-15, Acts 7:52)The cross is only Good News for those hearing Paul’s Gospel, and is even something to glory in because it is how we are saved (1 Corinthians 1:18, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4, Galatians 6:14)
From a relative perspective, Jesus gave His life as a ransom only for “many” — meaning only for those who obey this Gospel (Matthew 20:28)From an absolute perspective, Jesus gave His life as a ransom for all — meaning all humanity (1 Timothy 2:6)
Exhorted to remain in Him, and seem to be able to fall away and not be able to be renewed to repentance, so seem to be able to lose their sort of salvation (1 John 2:28, Hebrews 6:4-6, Hebrews 10:26-27), although this is only salvation from a relative perspective, and anyone who doesn’t experience this sort of salvation will still eventually experience the salvation of Paul’s Gospel from an absolute perspectiveIf we died with Christ — and if we did, we can’t un-die — we will live with Him, since He cannot disown His own body. Yes, we can “fall from grace,” so to speak — which basically just means placing oneself under the bondage of religion and rules, such as the law, and, because of doing so, missing out on enjoying the freedom Christ gave us — and it might be that we can also lose out on reigning with Him by denying Him in order to avoid suffering, but either way, we still remain His body, and He won’t amputate and disown His own body parts, and body parts can’t amputate themselves either (Galatians 5:1-4, 2 Timothy 2:11-13)
Abraham being justified by works given as an example (James 2:21-23)Abraham being justified by faith rather than by works given as an example (Romans 4:2-3)
Gentiles will be blessed by Israel’s rise in the future (Isaiah 49:6, Acts 3:25)Gentiles are currently blessed by Israel’s fall (Romans 11:11)
Salvation will come in the future, when the Kingdom comes fully to the earth, and when Israel’s sins are forgiven (1 Peter 1:5, Romans 11:25-27)We have already been saved now, and are, in fact, already complete in Christ (Ephesians 1:13, Colossians 2:10)
Healing others by the laying on of hands is a sign that will accompany believing members of this church, and members are advised to go to the elders for prayer and anointing with oil for their own healing (Mark 16:18, James 5:13-18)While Paul could heal people by having them simply touch his handkerchiefs at the beginning of his ministry, when he was still trying to convince Israelites to believe their own Gospel, by the end of his ministry, after giving up on Israel for the time being and deciding to only proclaim his own Gospel to the nations, he could no longer heal, and even gave medicinal advise to church members rather than advising them to seek healing from church elders (Acts 19:12, 1 Timothy 5:23, 2 Timothy 4:20)

I could go on and on, but if that isn’t enough to prove the point to someone, I don’t know what will be. The above comparison reveals a clear pattern of significant differences between the Israel of God and the body of Christ (as well as between their two Gospels and what their respective salvations entail), and if someone still can’t see the differences after reading that, I’m not sure there’s any hope left for them (at least in this age), because these aren’t just minor variations in terminology; these are quite obviously completely different sets of information regarding two completely different groups of people.

Unfortunately, if one isn’t being honest with Scripture and insists on trying to make these major differences between Paul’s teachings to the body of Christ and the teachings in the Circumcision writings say the same thing because their preconceived doctrinal biases force them to have to believe they mean the same thing, they’re just not ready to interpret the rest of Scripture. In fact, not only is this concept so extremely important for believers to grasp, it’s also so central to understanding what the Bible is saying that one can’t properly interpret much of Scripture at all without beginning from this perspective (not only that, if you don’t understand the difference between the two Gospels, you’ll end up preaching the adulterated “gospel” that Paul warned about in Galatians, which means understanding this is crucial to avoiding the condemnation Paul warned about in that epistle). So I pray that the above has made the differences clear to you. Whether they have or not, though, I go into more detail on this in this article, so I recommend checking it out for a deeper understanding of the things that differ.